Legal Opinion

Lamas v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1973No. 47997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, Judge.

Frank Baldwin sued Arthur A. Lamas and Happy Herman’s, Inc. for electrical work performed upon the business establishment of the latter. Lamas was the general contractor that employed Baldwin to perform the electrical work.

This is the fourth appearance of this litigation in this court. See Lamas Co., Inc. v. Baldwin, 118 Ga. App. 437 (164 SE2d 236); s. c., 120 Ga. App. 149 (169 SE2d 638); Baldwin v. Happy Herman’s, Inc., 122 Ga. App. 520 (177 SE2d 814). However, none of these cases has any bearing on the issues now before the court.

On June 5, 1972, the original suit came on to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The LAMAS COMPANY, INC. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. State Mutual Life Insurance v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Dobbins v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. LAMAS COMPANY, INC. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lamas v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Haire v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Automated Medical Services, Inc. v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Hood Oil Company v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. PRUDENTIAL TIMBER & FARM COMPANY v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API