Legal Opinion

Wylie v. Tull

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 1, 1989No. 89-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an appeal from a chancery court decree quieting title to forty-nine parcels of land in the appellees. The appellants, William G. and Carolyn S. Wylie, are the successors in interest to the Chicago Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company and its predecessors to which the lands in question were conveyed when railroad lines were being built in Arkansas. The forty-seven appellees are successors to the grantors. The chancellor held in favor of the appellees on the ground that each deed was a conveyance of a right of way easement rather than fee simple, and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Helena & Northwestern RailwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. El Dorado & Wesson Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Coleman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Lynch v. CypertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. TappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brissett v. SykesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Winningham v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Brewer and Taylor Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Nature Conservancy v. KolbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API