State v. Scott
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Analysis and Decision
1. Police officer's opinion on offensive and defensive wounds.
[¶9.] In the following exchange, defense counsel asked Officer Huemoeller to relate her "training and experience about individuals who end up with scratch marks on their hands[.]"
Officer Huemoeller: It can be either defense wounds or it can be from causing injuries themselves.
Defense Counsel: How would one end up with injuries on their hands from causing injuries to themselves?
Officer Huemoeller: If they were to strike someone, they could cause bruising or scratching to their knuckles.
Defense Counsel: So the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Southern Union Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Jerome Campbell v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TimmonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- S.D. Petroleum Release Compensation Fund v. BpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. AhmedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.