Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2019No. #28487PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Analysis and Decision

1. Police officer's opinion on offensive and defensive wounds.

[¶9.] In the following exchange, defense counsel asked Officer Huemoeller to relate her "training and experience about individuals who end up with scratch marks on their hands[.]"

Officer Huemoeller: It can be either defense wounds or it can be from causing injuries themselves.

Defense Counsel: How would one end up with injuries on their hands from causing injuries to themselves?

Officer Huemoeller: If they were to strike someone, they could cause bruising or scratching to their knuckles.

Defense Counsel: So the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Southern Union Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Jerome Campbell v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TimmonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. S.D. Petroleum Release Compensation Fund v. BpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. AhmedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API