Marin v. McClincy
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Mel M. Marin (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint in this Court on July 20, 2011, naming Melissa Thompson (“Ms. Thompson”) and William McClincy (“Mr. McClincy”) (“defendants”) and alleging violations of his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments along with several state law claims.1 (Doc. No. 4). Presently before *608this Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 34, 38). For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion [34] will be granted and plaintiffs motion [38] will be denied.
II. Background
Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alston v. Nat'l Conference of Bar Exam'rsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LP v. EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- JOHNSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY AND HAIRSTYLINGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Marin v. CatanoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023