Legal Opinion

People v. Bostelman

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2006No. 04CA1223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.

Defendant, Deitrich Franz Bostelman, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim. P. 35(e) motion for postconviction relief and a separate order granting the People’s motion for revocation. We affirm.

The People alleged that defendant committed a burglary eight days before his fourteenth birthday. They direct filed this charge in district court shortly after defendant turned fourteen. Defendant pled guilty to the burglary and received a twelve-year Department of Corrections (DOC) sentence, suspended on the condition that he successfully complete a six-year sentence in the Youthful…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bostelman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. MenorColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Stevinson Imports, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. HummelColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. MenorColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API