Legal Opinion
Daniel Alvarez v. Los Angeles County et al.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 11, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01035Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 DANIEL ALVAREZ, Case № 2:24-cv-01035-ODW (MARx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., [58] 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 On July 15, 2025, the Court dismissed all claims asserted by Plaintiff Daniel 19 Alvarez against Defendant Catherine Reay.1 (Order Grant Mot. Strike (“Anti-SLAPP 20 Order”), Dkt. No. 56.) Reay now moves to recover her attorneys’ fees as a prevailing 21 party pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuits…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.