Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Dothan Progress

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 27, 1991No. 2900309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The issue in this case is as follows: Whether ink and newsprint purchased at wholesale and withdrawn from inventory or stock for use in producing or printing newspapers which are distributed free are subject to sales tax pursuant to the “withdrawal for use” provisions of §§ 40-23-1(a)(6) and (10), Code 1975 (as amended).

This is the second time this issue has been before this court. In the case of Ex parte The Dothan Progress, 507 So.2d 515 (Ala.1987), the supreme court reversed this court and found that the aforementioned business transaction did not give rise to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Ex Parte Morrison Food Service of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Rabren v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Ex Parte Dothan ProgressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Sizemore v. Dothan ProgressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API