Legal Opinion

Naylor v. Fosdick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 15, 1810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MOTION for a new trial. "This was a scire facias against the defendant as garnishee of Gurdon. Manwaring, of JVew-York, an abs&rtt . . debtor. The defendant pleaded that he was not the agent or debtor of Manwaring, and had none of his ef-^ects ⅛ his hands. On trial to the jury before the superior court, it appeared that the previous proceedings had been conformable to the statute regarding foreign attach-*nents,(a) and that the defendant was indebted to Man-waring.

Read the full summary

MOTION for a new trial. "This was a scire facias against the defendant as garnishee of Gurdon. Manwaring, of JVew-York, an abs&rtt . . debtor. The defendant pleaded that he was not the agent or debtor of Manwaring, and had none of his ef-^ects ⅛ his hands. On trial to the jury before the superior court, it appeared that the previous proceedings had been conformable to the statute regarding foreign attach-*nents,(a) and that the defendant was indebted to Man-waring. The defence was, that this debt had been as- ' signed before the copy was left in service. The circumstances under which the…

1Opinion of the CourtSwift, J.

The question arising in this case is, whether a debtor in failing circumstances can make an as-«ignment of his estate to a trustee for the benefit of his creditors, with the assent of part of them expressed either prior, or subsequent, to such assignment, which shall be valid against creditors who dissent; so that such dissenting creditors cannot take such estate by legal process to satisfy their debts ?

I lay no weight on the objection to this assignment on account of the consideration; for if the trustee is duly constituted with the assent of the creditors, his obligation to execute the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilt v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1809
  2. Tudor Woodbridge & Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
  3. Hempstead v. StarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Robinson v. RapelyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1829
  3. Vanbuskirk v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  4. Leitensdorfer v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Leitensdorfer v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API