Leitensdorfer v. Webb
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe district court for tbe first judicial district. Tlie opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Baker sufficiently states tbe case.
1DissentWatts, J.
[His honor first stated the facts very minutely, but as they are sufficiently stated in the foregoing opinion of Chief Justice Baker, it seems unnecessary to duplicate that statement. With this exception, the following is Mr. Justice Watts’ opinion in full:]
The third instruction asked for by the defendant and refused by the court, and the fourth instruction asked-for by the defendant and given by the court, were immaterial to the isue then on trial, and the giving or refusing of them could not affect this case. The issue was whether Leitens-dorfer and Houghton had fraudulently disposed of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Halsey v. FairbanksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1826
- Wilkes & Fontaine v. FerrisNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Tompkins v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.