Legal Opinion

Shinloub v. Ammerman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

Ammerman sued Shinloub in slander, and complained that on, &c., the defendant spoke the following false and slanderous words of the plaintiff, that is to say, he (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie; Wince, (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie; Ammerman (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie, and I can prove it; he (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie before Belmont (meaning James B. Belmont, a justice of the peace,) and I can prove it; by which plaintiff is damaged, &c.

The defendant demurred to the complaint, and assigned for cause of demurrer that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cummins v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Higert v. Trustees of Indiana Asbury UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kent v. CantrallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API