Shinloub v. Ammerman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.
Ammerman sued Shinloub in slander, and complained that on, &c., the defendant spoke the following false and slanderous words of the plaintiff, that is to say, he (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie; Wince, (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie; Ammerman (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie, and I can prove it; he (meaning the plaintiff) swore a lie before Belmont (meaning James B. Belmont, a justice of the peace,) and I can prove it; by which plaintiff is damaged, &c.
The defendant demurred to the complaint, and assigned for cause of demurrer that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cummins v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
3Cited by7 opinions
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Higert v. Trustees of Indiana Asbury UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Kent v. CantrallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.