Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Butler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Pike Circuit Court. Butler was the plaintiff below, and Cummins the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case in slander. The declaration contains one count, in which-it is charged, “that the defendant, on the 1st day of February, 1829, and at divers other days and times, to wit, &c. spoke and published of and concerning the said plaintiff, these false and scandalous words, to wit:- — ‘ John Butler (meaning the said plaintiff) swore a lie in the case oí Noah Anderson against myself, (meaning him the said defendant, and referring toa suit previously determined in the Pike Circuit Court,) and I (the said defendant meaning) can prove it. He (the said John…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benson v. SwiftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  2. Martin v. MellonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weston v. LumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Abrams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Smith v. HollisterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  5. Severinghaus v. BeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API