Legal Opinion

Shongut v. Malnik

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 1965No. Nos. 64-911, 64-1068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Chief Judge.

By these consolidated appeals, we are called upon to review a post-final summary judgment order denying a motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.38(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., and an order of a chancellor denying a motion to dismiss, motion for summary decree and motion to strike. We affirm both orders.

It is apparent that the matters attempted to be brought to the attention of the trial judge in the common law action could have been available to the movant during the trial proceedings. Therefore, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finneran v. City of Lake WorthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Ideal Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. KatzentineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Lieberman v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miami National Bank v. SobelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Fagan v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Bare Necessities, Inc. v. EstradaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API