Legal Opinion

Finneran v. City of Lake Worth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 1963No. 3624PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Judge.

Catherine Finneran and Charles Finner-an, her husband, appeal a final judgment dismissing their amended complaint as fatally defective because there was no oath to the advance notice of their tort claim against the defendant municipality. The final judgment reads in pertinent part as follows:

“This cause coming on to be heard pursuant to notice and the Court having heretofore granted the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint and having dismissed the same without leave to amend because it appears that the Plaintiffs failed to give notice to the Defendant municipality *502w…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crumbley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Tillman v. City of Pompano BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Hoffman v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Magee v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Brandon v. County of PinellasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Washington SEC. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Robinson v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Shongut v. MalnikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API