Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Marsh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1934No. 25307. Department OnePublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action for rent of a building upon a written lease made by plaintiffs to defendants. The defense interposed was a constructive eviction by the lessors because of defects which were known to the lessors, of which they failed to inform the lessees prior to the lease, which the lessees did not know; and by reason of said defects the building was unfit for the purposes for which it was leased. By cross-complaint, defendants sought recovery for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the condition of the premises. The cause was tried to the court, which found that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sunasack v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Farmers State Bank of Newport v. LamonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Borggard v. GaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Lazarus & Cohen v. ParmlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Long v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Obde v. SchlemeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. McCutcheon v. BrownfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API