Legal Opinion
Regal Construction Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 2010No. 109PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
Once again, we are asked to determine the obligation of an insurer to defend and indemnify an additional insured for potential liability arising out of the operations of the primary insured (see e.g. Worth Constr. Co., Inc. v Admiral Ins. Co., 10 NY3d 411 [2008]). The City of New York engaged URS Corporation (URS) as the construction manager for a renovation project at Rikers Island. By written agreement dated March 22, 1999, URS hired plaintiff Regal Construction Corporation (Regal) to serve as a prime contractor for general construction at the project,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Automobile Insurance v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- BP Air Conditioning Corp. v. One Beacon Insurance GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Maroney v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Worth Constr. v. Admiral Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Federal Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- The Burlington Insurance Company v. NYC Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hunter Roberts Construction Group, LLC v. Arch InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Michael Lancaster v. Ferrell Paving, Inc. v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Stout v. 1 East 66th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.