Walker v. Gross
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiffs seek a determination, under G. L. c. 240, § 10A, that a deed restriction providing that no part of their premises in Waltham shall be “used for any business purpose” does not prevent the use of their premises for an apartment house. The plaintiffs’ land is subject to a restriction, imposed by a 1947 deed to a predecessor in title, which reads as follows: “The premises are conveyed with the benefit of and subject to any easements of record and subject to a permanent restriction that no part of the premises shall be used for any business purpose except for raising, growing and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- DeBlois v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- St. Botolph Club, Inc. v. Brookline Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Whipple v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parks v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Brear v. FaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Brennan v. KosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Sonterra Capital Partners, Ltd. v. Sonterra Property Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- Chatham Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. FarberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.