Legal Opinion
Sonterra Capital Partners, Ltd. v. Sonterra Property Owners Ass'n
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided September 20, 2006No. 04-05-00358-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.
The owner of a commercial building in the Sonterra subdivision of Stone Oak must pay its allocated share of the assessments necessary to maintain common areas and provide essential services. The primary issue in this appeal is whether, under the Sonterra Property Owners Association Declaration of Covenants, an apartment complex is a commercial building because its owner’s primary purpose in owning it is to generate profits or a residence because its occupants use their individual apartments for residential purposes. We agree with the trial court that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Little v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. State Farm LloydsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Alsatian Heights Homeowners Association v. Omar Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- CamargoCopeland Architects, L.L.P. v. CRT Signature Place, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Ed-Sal Investments, Ltd. v. Needmore Ranch II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Larry Edberg and Julie Edberg v. the Laurel Canyon Ranch Architectural Review Committee, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.