Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1835PublishedCited by 7 opinions

- Hatch declared, in assumpsit, in the Circuit Court of 'Franklin, against Crawford, on a written agreement, signed by himself and the defendant’s intestate. The cause of action concluded, “ Given under our hands and seals,” and was signed by Hatch and Crawford, the latter immediately under the signature of the first. Following Hatch’s name, there was & seal, but none to Crawford’s. On the plea of gene-tal issue, a verdict was rendered for the defendant.

Read the full summary

- Hatch declared, in assumpsit, in the Circuit Court of 'Franklin, against Crawford, on a written agreement, signed by himself and the defendant’s intestate. The cause of action concluded, “ Given under our hands and seals,” and was signed by Hatch and Crawford, the latter immediately under the signature of the first. Following Hatch’s name, there was & seal, but none to Crawford’s. On the plea of gene-tal issue, a verdict was rendered for the defendant. In the progress of the trial, the Court below, excluded the agreement declared on, from the jury, on the .ground, that the same was a sealed…

1Opinion of the Court

By Mr. Chief-Justice Saeeold

The present plaintiff declared against Mary Crawford, as administratrix of the estate of James Crawford, deceased, in assumpsit. The cause of action is a memorandum of an agreement between said Hatch and James Crawford, the intestate, containing reciprocal stipulations for and against each of the parties, and concludes with these words : “ Given under our hands and seals, this 30th day of September, 1830” — Signed, R. Hatch — James Crawford — one name being placed directly below the other : opposite the name of Hatch, a seal is affixed, which is the only one to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SharpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Carter v. Doe ex dem. ChaudronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Cotten v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1846
  4. Grimmet v. Henderson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Caton v. First Nat. Bank of OzarkAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API