Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2752 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Bdatt,

George Ingram (claimant) appeals here from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Beview (Board) affirming a referee’s denial of benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,1 which disqualifies individuals discharged for willful misconduct. He argues (1) that the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence and (2) that his conduct did not constitute willful misconduct.

The claimant had been employed as a truck driver but was discharged by his employer because he had been involved in three accidents within a five-month…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Schappe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Meek v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Toff v. RohdeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Parke v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Colonial Taxi & Paratransit Services, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Fortna v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Wisniewski v. EhemannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API