Legal Opinion
Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Vaughn
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1920No. 129-3018PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Suit by Tom Vaugbn, defendant in error, against tbe Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company of Texas, and Panhandle & Santa Eé, and the Galveston, Houston & San Antonio Railway Companies' to recover damages to a shipment of cattle from Marfa, Tex., to Plainview, Tex.
Plaintiff alleged a delay of 26 hours upon the part of the Galveston, Houston & San Antonio Railway Company, at Marfa, in loading out the cattle after they were received at the pens; five hours’ delay on the part of the Panhandle & Santa Eé Railway Company, at Sweetwater, before unloading there, and five hours after reloading…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hume Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Browder v. Memphis Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casualty Insurance Co. of California v. SalinasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Casualty Insurance Co. of California v. SalinasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Casualty Insurance Co. of California v. SalinasTexas Supreme Court · 1960