Casualty Insurance Co. of California v. Salinas
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Griffin
“Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.” Proverbs, 22:28.
For more than forty years it has been the holding of this Court that before this Court would take jurisdiction of a complaint about the admission or rejection of evidence the evidence must be “controlling” or the case must “turn” upon the evidence point. The majority opinion herein sets aside and overrules this holding and seeks to substitute a holding that this Court has jurisdiction to correct an error relating to the admission or exclusion of testimony where it is made to appear that the action of the trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Kirksey v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- Noa Spears and Wife v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Allen v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Hanks v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.