Gregory S. McAmis v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment granting him post-conviction relief, Gregory Scott McAmis argues that although the district court properly determined that he was entitled to post-conviction relief, it erred in ordering resentencing as a remedy rather than permitting him to "withdraw his guilty plea.
I
BACKGROUND
McAmis was charged with grand theft, felony, Idaho Code §§ 18-2403, 18-2407, and the State alleged that he was subject to a persistent violator sentence enhancement, I.C. § 19-2514. The parties reached a plea agreement under which McAmis would plead guilty to grand theft.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Gregory Scott McAmisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Washington v. Tim McManisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. Thomas Nelson FarmerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016