Legal Opinion

Gregory S. McAmis v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2013No. 40417PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

In this appeal from a judgment granting him post-conviction relief, Gregory Scott McAmis argues that although the district court properly determined that he was entitled to post-conviction relief, it erred in ordering resentencing as a remedy rather than permitting him to "withdraw his guilty plea.

I

BACKGROUND

McAmis was charged with grand theft, felony, Idaho Code §§ 18-2403, 18-2407, and the State alleged that he was subject to a persistent violator sentence enhancement, I.C. § 19-2514. The parties reached a plea agreement under which McAmis would plead guilty to grand theft.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Gregory Scott McAmisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State of Washington v. Tim McManisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
  3. State v. CarrascoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State v. CarrascoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. State v. Thomas Nelson FarmerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API