Legal Opinion

Ray v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 1, 2011No. Civil Action 3:07cv175-WHA-TFMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This cause is before the court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) (Doc. # 123). The Plaintiffs, Meredith Chadwick Ray (“Meredith Ray”) and Phillip Ray (collectively, the “Rays”) filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. # 27-1) in this case alleging that Ford is liable to them on the basis of (1) the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine (“AEMLD”) (Count One); (2) negligence (Count Two); (3) wantonness (Count Three); and (4) loss of consortium (Count Four). 1 Ford moved…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Bryant Flury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. Boeing Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  2. McKinney v. Superior Van & Mobility, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  3. White v. Walgreen CoDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API