Legal Opinion
Southern California Rapid Transit District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1994No. B083598PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Petitioners Southern California Rapid Transit District (District), Ernesto Fuentes (Fuentes) and Nick Patsaouras (Patsaouras) (collectively, defendants) 1 seek a writ of mandate from this court compelling the trial court to grant their summary judgment motion on the complaint of the real parties in interest, Allen Laster (Laster) and Richard Yeats (Yeats) (collectively, plaintiffs).
This action arose out of the claim by plaintiffs that they were wrongfully terminated by the District from their position as employees hired by the District to investigate fraud, waste and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. Altus Finance, S.A.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Record v. ReasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.