Ponder v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for misdemeanor; from Glynn superior courtJndge Highsmith. August 2, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1.- “A ground of the motion for a new trial based upon the admission of testimony is altogether vain and futile unless the ground is complete in itself and shows what objections to the testimony were urged at the time it was offered or admitted.” Wilkinson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 330 (89 S. E. 460). It does not appear from the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that any objection to the evidence complained of therein was urged at the trial. As to the .admissibility of the testimony, see Calhoun v. State, 144 Ga. 679 (87 S. E. 893), s. c. 17 Ga. App. 705 (88 S. E. 586);…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Duren v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Worley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Kemp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Mahar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Berry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.