Arthur D’Amario, III v. Globe Photos, Inc.; Globe Entertainment and Media Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ARTHUR D’AMARIO, III, Case No. 2:25-cv-02001-APG-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 GLOBE PHOTOS, INC.; GLOBE ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA CORP., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), 11 which is complete. ECF No. 1. Also pending is Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1-1), which fails to 12 establish subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute at issue. For this reason, the Court dismisses 13 Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. 14 I. Screening…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.