Goldstein v. Bologna
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.
This is an application by the attorneys who were substituted for a disbarred attorney to determine the statutory lien, if any, of the prior attorney, following the settlement of the case. The decisions of the courts in this Judicial Department are in conflict. In Flecha v. Goodman (31 Misc 2d 444) Mr. Justice Rabin held that an attorney who had been suspended had a charging lien for the value of his services, reasoning that to deny him compensation would be to condone unjust enrichment. This case, however, is distinguishable from the instant one in that the disbarred attorney is accused of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flecha v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Gary v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. GartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Natole v. NatoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. GartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978