Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Rys. Co. v. Chapman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 28, 1906No. 17PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in error, John Chapman, hereinafter called the plaintiff, brought this suit in the Circuit Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of the plaintiff in error, the Pittsburgh Railways Company, hereinafter called the defendant.

*887The plaintiff was a brakeman emploj-ed by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, and suffered the injuries complained of on the 4th day of March, 1903, by coming in contact with the trolley wire of defendant, or the guy wire used for its support, while…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Cox v. Maryland Electric Railways Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Young v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Brimer v. ScheibelTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Griffith v. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API