Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Missouri Gas Energy v. Public Service Commission
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2006No. WD 66666PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.
Facts and Procedural Background
On October 21, 2005, the Office of the Public Counsel (OPC) filed a Motion to Open a New Case and for Finding of Necessity for Rulemaking with the Public Service Commission (Commission). The OPC proposed an emergency amendment to the Cold Weather Rule (CWR).
The existing CWR prescribes the conditions for disconnection and reconnection of heat-related utility services from November 1 through March 31. See 4 C.S.R. 240.13.055. Under the rule a customer must pay 80% of the outstanding bill to prevent disconnection or to allow reconnection of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Oldaker v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lightfoot v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Alma Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Atmos Energy Corp. v. Public Service Commission of the StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- AG Processing Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- In the Matter of Kansas City Power&Light Company's Request for Authority to Implement a General Rate Increase for Electric Service, And Midwest energy Consumers' Group v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Aquila, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Public Service Commission v. Missouri Gas EnergyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Pipeline Co. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.