Legal Opinion

People v. Van Note

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 1978No. 77-1687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

The defendants, Richard Van Note and Fred Lozo, were indicted for, inter alia, illegal manufacture and illegal possession of a controlled substance. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 56%, par. 1401.) Prior to trial defendants moved to suppress certain evidence seized at their place of business. The trial court granted the motion and the State has appealed.

We affirm the order of the trial court.

The only testimony at the hearing on the motion to suppress was that of Investigator James Peterson of the Chicago Police Department. He executed the search warrant, which commanded that he search the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. ClayIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. The PEOPLE v. StansberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. The People v. SaikenIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. SeymourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. People v. MaddoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. SmithersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API