Legal Opinion

Sack v. Director General of Railroads

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort. The plaintiff alleges that he was entitled to the rights of a passenger on the transportation system known as the New York, New *117Haven and Hartford Railroad in attempting to board a train for Boston at the station in Quincy in this Commonwealth at a Httle after two o’clock on the afternoon of Saturday, June 29, 1918, and received injury through the negligence of servants of the defendant in failing to control the crowd of people at the station, to give adequate warning of danger, and to police the station properly. The injuries occurred during the period of federal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Perkins v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Foley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Kuhlen v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Quigley v. Wilson Line of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Phillips v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. L. L. Cohen & Co. v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Weiss v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Morris v. Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API