Weiss v. Director General of Railroads
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action begun on May 15, 1919, wherein the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company was named as defendant. The cause of action arises at common law and not under any statute. It is to recover compensation for the loss of merchandise while in course of transportation by a common carrier. The shipment and loss occurred in November, 1918. A reasonable time for the delivery of the merchandise was not later than early in December, 1918. The case has been before us under the name Nominsky v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 239 Mass. 254. It then was decided on June 29,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Davis v. WechslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Danforth v. Groton Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Bengar v. Clark Equipment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.