Legal Opinion

State v. Steen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2004No. 20020343, 20040052PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Randal Steen appealed from a criminal judgment of conviction for possession and manufacture of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia, and from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm, concluding the trial court did not err when it determined Steen had failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.

I

[¶ 2] On January 16, 2002, Deputy Dan Wentz of the Burleigh County Sheriffs Office was attempting to serve civil papers upon Randal Steen and was informed that Steen was staying in Room 55…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Steen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Wright v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API