Legal Opinion

Tamosiunas v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 15, 2018No. 16-1338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMillett, Circuit Judge

Several Hyatt Regency Hotel employees in Hawaii objected to and formally declined full membership in their union. Nonetheless, they received a letter from the union requiring immediate payment of full union dues-that is, dues owed by employees who chose to join the union in full. The letter went on to inform the employees that the Hyatt Regency Hotel would soon be deducting the amounts necessary to pay full union dues from future paychecks at the union's behest. The Board concluded that, in its view, the letter was an obvious mistake and no reasonable employee reading it would have felt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas McLamb v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API