Legal Opinion
Eastcott v. Hasselblad USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 4, 2014No. 2013-1050, 2013-1051UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
This patent appeal involves camera lens technology and the district court’s imposition of sanctions for a “sham” invoice requesting expert fees. In 2011, Appellant John Eastcott filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Appel-lees Hasselblad A/S, Hasselblad USA Inc., and B & H Photo & Electronics Corp. alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,592,331 (“the '331 patent”). Specifically, Eastcott asserted that the Hasselblad HTS 1.5 adapter infringed claims 1, 6, and 26 of the '331 patent. Appellees…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Artec Europe S.À.R.L. v. Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Jimuyida Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025