Legal Opinion

United States v. R. L. Dixon & Bro., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 23, 1940No. 322PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

The United States sued the defendant for the 3 cents per pound statutory penalty for the alleged purchase of three lots of cotton totaling 622 bales, 292,007 pounds, from third-party defendant Hawthorne, in the fall of 1939.

The allegation is, that R. C. Hawthorne and his sons, R. A. and Raymond Hawthorne, operated four farms from which the cotton was marketed. That at the time of the purchase of the cotton by the defendant, none of it was identified as subject, or as not subject, to the marketing penalty imposed by Sec. 348 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. FisherDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  2. Hawthorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. HawthorneDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. English Freight Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Topping v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. Shannon v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945
  4. United States v. StanglandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1956
  5. Brown v. Wyatt Food Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API