Legal Opinion

Painter v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1985No. G001947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Donna B. Painter has petitioned for a writ of review after the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied her petition for reconsideration. We consider whether the order denying reconsideration is supported by an adequate statement as required by the Labor Code. The trial judge prepares a report on reconsideration because he or she has had an opportunity to observe the witnesses and exhibits. Here there was no report so the WCAB incorporated the original decision and examined the record itself. While the board itself may have done more than is customary on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Baker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Bonner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Postural Therapeutics v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Pinkerton, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API