Legal Opinion

Cleveland Brothers Equipment Company v. Vorobey

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 2023No. 4:19-cv-01708-MWBUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLEVELAND BROTHERS No. 4:19-CV-01708 EQUIPMENT CO., INC., (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. GRIGORIY N. VOROBEY, and GRIGORIY N. VOROBEY, d/b/a GVN TRANSPORT, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL A. MILLER. Third Party Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION FEBRUARY 10, 2023 I. BACKGROUND In 2019, Cleveland Brothers Equipment Co., Inc. (“Cleveland Brothers”) filed a complaint seeking contribution from Grigoriy N. Vorobey and Grigoriy N. Vorobey d/b/a GVN Transport (collectively “Vorobey”), for sums that Cleveland…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API