Rauh v. Scholl

This is the second time this action has been before tbis court. See 12 Wash. 135 (40 Pac. 726), where a judgment in favor of defendants was reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial, which was had, resulting again in favor of defendants, and plaintiff takes this appeal. The respondents move to strike the statement of facts on the ground that the same was settled by the judge after his term of office had expired. The motion would *31be well taken under Hallam v. Tillinghast, recently decided, ante, p. 20, were it not for the fact that in this case appellants also procured a certificate of…