Legal Opinion

Rauh v. Scholl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1895No. 1779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

On the 5th day of February, 1891, appellants executed a written lease of certain real property to the respondents, for the term of- three years, at *136a monthly rental of $35 per month, said lease containing a provision authorizing and permitting a sub-letting' of said premises during the whole or any portion of the term; and also containing an express covenant on the part of the respondents to pay said rental for the full period and as provided in said lease. Thereupon respondents went into possession of said premises. This action was brought…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rauh v. SchollWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Spokane v. Catholic Bishop of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API