Legal Opinion

Gray v. Clement

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a suit brought under Section 1970,' Revised Statutes 1919, to quiet title to certain real estate in the city of Saint Louis, and in ejectment. This is the second appeal in this case. On. a former trial there was a judgment for defendants and plaintiffs appealed. This court reversed and remanded the case. [Gray v. Clement, 286 Mo. 100.] The hearing and determination following this reversal constitute the matters for review.

This property, as described in the petition, was devised by Francois Giraldin, the owner of the fee, to his daughter Josephine Brokel for life, with remainder in fee…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koehler v. RowlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Throckmorton v. PenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Gray Ex Rel. Brokel v. ClementSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Stockwell v. StockwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Carson v. HeckeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Aetna Insurance v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Rhodus v. GeatleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Brown v. BibbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API