Kincaid v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER
BOEHM, Justice.
The Court of Appeals concluded that double jeopardy required that time served on probation must be credited toward a new sentence of probation imposed for the same conviction after a defendant successfully petitions for post-conviction relief. We agree. Kincaid’s claim is also governed by Indiana Code section 35-50-1-5 and Post Conviction Rule 1(10), which require credit for time served by a successful post-conviction petitioner who is resen-tenced. However, because Kincaid did not appeal his sentence until after he violated the terms of his probation,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Andrew Leo Oksanen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Mapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. HenriquesNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Jada Sha'nel Monroe v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
- Kincaid v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003