Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2002No. 06S01-0204-PC-258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

The Court of Appeals concluded that double jeopardy required that time served on probation must be credited toward a new sentence of probation imposed for the same conviction after a defendant successfully petitions for post-conviction relief. We agree. Kincaid’s claim is also governed by Indiana Code section 35-50-1-5 and Post Conviction Rule 1(10), which require credit for time served by a successful post-conviction petitioner who is resen-tenced. However, because Kincaid did not appeal his sentence until after he violated the terms of his probation,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Andrew Leo Oksanen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Mapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. HenriquesNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Jada Sha'nel Monroe v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Kincaid v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API