Legal Opinion

Muto v. County of Mendocino

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 3, 2022No. 3:20-cv-06232Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 MARY MUTO, Case No. 20-cv-06232-SK 6 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR 7 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 8 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Regarding Docket Nos. 38, 38-14; 56 9 Defendant. 10 Defendant County of Mendocino (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment in this 11 matter. (Dkt. Nos. 38, 56.) Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record in the 12 case, and the relevant legal authorities, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court 13 HEREBY GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, for the reasons set…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API