Legal Opinion

In Re Busman

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1980No. 1-19-40768PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

C. ALBERT PARENTE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue presented arises from an objection filed by the United States Attorney, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), opposing the confirmation of Marvin and Laura Busman’s (hereafter “debtors”) amended plan of arrangement under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The plan provides for payment to priority creditors at one-hundred percent of their scheduled claims, without interest, over a thirty-six month period. IRS is listed in the amended plan as a priority creditor.

At the time of filing the petition, the debtors had outstanding a tax…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruning v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of New York v. SaperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Matter of CrockettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  4. Littleton v. KincaidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Southern States Motor Inns, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Southern States Motor Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  3. In Re FisherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  4. In Re Stack Steel & Supply Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
  5. In the Matter of Vincent Lapiana and Barbara Lapiana, Debtors. Appeal of Millard G. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API