Legal Opinion
Atlantic States Legal Foundation v. Onondaga County Department of Drainage & Sanitation
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 7, 2001No. 88-CV-0066PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The City of Syracuse and the Syracuse Urban Renewal Agency (“City”) filed a motion for summary judgment contending that the County of Onondaga (“County”) cannot, as a matter of law, condemn property within the City for a sewage treatment plant. The County then filed a cross-motion seeking summary judgement on the basis that condemnation of the subject property is appropriate here as a matter of law. For the reasons that follow, the County’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and the City’s motion is granted in part and denied in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City Of Syracuse v. Onondaga CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- City of Syracuse v. Onondaga CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2003