Legal Opinion

H. Kramer & Co. v. Cummings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1922No. Gen. No. 26,894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

This suit was brought to recover $177.12, the price of goods sold and delivered. The court found the issues for plaintiff and entered judgment for that sum against the several defendants. Two of the defendants, Condon and Burkholder, have appealed. The main question is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish a joint liability, or any liability, on the part of defendants.

Condon, Burkholder and Cummings entered into a written agreement with one another, termed “Declarations of Trust of Boman Metals Co., Ltd.,” by which they, as. trustees, were to take title to all property, including…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Glenn v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Greene v. People ex rel. PaveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Conover v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Guthmann v. Adco Dry Storage Battery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Review Printing & Stationery Co. v. McCoyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  5. Hunter v. WinterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API