Legal Opinion
Review Printing & Stationery Co. v. McCoy
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 24, 1934No. Gen. No. 8,798PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dove
The sufficiency of the allegations of an additional count to plaintiff’s declaration was challenged by a general demurrer. Upon a hearing, the demurrer was sustained and plaintiff electing to stand by its additional count, the same was dismissed and from that judgment an appeal has been perfected to this court.
This additional count alleged that on August 3,1921, a written agreement and a declaration of trust was executed by Reuben H. Donnelly, Harry M. Johnson, John H. Camlin, Mary A. McCoy, Mary M. McCoy and Walker K. Frost. This instrument is set forth in haec verba in the additional count,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Royal L. Brockob Construction Co. v. Trust Co. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Review Printing & Stationery Co. v. McCoyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Levy v. NellisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936