Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided August 26, 2005No. Civil Action 4:04CV124LNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) has filed in this case (1) a motion for summary judgment as to all plaintiffs physically assaulted based on the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Law; and (2) a motion for dismissal, or alternatively, for summary judgment as to all plaintiffs not physically assaulted. Although plaintiffs have submitted responses to both motions, they have also moved to stay consideration of the motions and for an extension of time to respond to the motions pursuant to Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- O'CAIN v. Harvey Freeman and Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. McRae's, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Griffin v. Futorian Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. EstessMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Franklin Corp. v. TedfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Lee v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
- Franklin Corp. v. TedfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Franklin Corporation v. Pauline TedfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.