Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1980No. 80-153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Chancery Court of Craighead County and involves the issue of usury. The case presents no unusual problems because a routine FHA loan is involved. The chancellor found that all of the loan closing charges were legitimate and that the interest charged did not exceed 10%. We agree with this judgment and affirm the decree.

Gary Johnson purchased a house in 1974 from George and Marie Baldwin. Originally the parties agreed that the sale price would be $43,500.00. For some reason, apparently because Johnson could not get a conventional loan, a new…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Moore v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooprider v. Security BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  3. In re BorumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API