Legal Opinion

State v. Breaux

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 12, 2012No. 66216-3-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

273 P.3d 447 (2012)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Reginald Karl BREAUX, Appellant.

No. 66216-3-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 12, 2012.

Christopher Gibson, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Randi J. Austell, Attorney at Law, King Co. Pros. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

LAU, J.

¶ 1 This case involves a dispute under RCW 9.94A.589(1)(b), which provides for mandatory consecutive sentences whenever a person is convicted of two or more serious violent offenses arising from separate and distinct criminal conduct. Reginald Breaux pleaded guilty to two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Brian RonquilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State of Washington v. Thomas Lee WeatherwaxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State Of Washington v. Esteban Joel FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. Jamal SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API